Cases 1 - 10 of 13
GREER v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00948
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gerard Greer
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, VIVA USA, Inc. and American Copytaster, Incorporated
David McNeil v. IBM
as 23-7162
Petitioner / Appellant:
David McNeil
Respondent / Appellee:
International Business Machines Corporation
MATEK, INCORPORATED v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
as 1:2023cv01847
Plaintiff:
MATEK, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
John Holtman v. IBM
as 23-7005
Petitioner / Appellant:
John Holtman
Respondent / Appellee:
International Business Machines Corporation
James Owens v. IBM
as 23-7002
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Owens
Respondent / Appellee:
International Business Machines Corporation
McNEIL V. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.
as 1:2022cv02378
Plaintiff:
David McNeill
Respondent:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.
Petitioner:
DAVID MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
OWENS v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.
as 1:2022cv00901
Petitioner:
JAMES OWENS
Respondent:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
HOLTMAN v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.
as 1:2022cv00852
Petitioner:
JOHN HOLTMAN
Respondent:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. International Business Machin
as 21-7022
Defendant / Appellee:
International Business Machines Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lakshmi Arunachalam, Dr.
ARUNACHALAM v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
as 1:2020cv02362
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
