Cases 1 - 4 of 4
In re: Baker, Todd v. DC, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 01-5205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd Emerson Baker
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, Kathleen Hawk Sawyer, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Ronald Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Kalka, Ben v. Hawk, Kathleen, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 98-5485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ben Kalka
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Hawk Sawyer, Director, Bureau of Prisons, Ed Crosley, Administrative Remedy Coordinator and John Does, 1-20, Bureau of Prisons Staff
Appointed Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
William M. Hohengarten
Farmer, Dee v. Moritsugu, Kenneth, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 98-5087
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Dee Diedre Farmer
Defendant - Appellant:
Kenneth Moritsugu, individually and as Medical Director of the Bureau of Prisons
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Hawk Sawyer, Director of the Bureau of Prisons
Amatel, Joseph, et al v. Hawk, Kathleen, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 97-5293
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Joseph Amatel, Playboy Enterprises, Incorporated, General Media Communications, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kathleen Hawk Sawyer, Director, Bureau of Prisons, Joel Knowles, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary and Stephen DeWalt, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Petersburg
Defendant:
J. D. Lamer, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary, Lewisburg
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
National Coalition for the Protection of Children & Families, The Salvation Army, Corrections Consulting and Training and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.