Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
John Bowman, Jr. v. Kimberly Iddon, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-7118
Plaintiff - Appellant: John J. Bowman, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: Kimberly Iddon, Karen F. Copeland, Rita C. Barnett and others
BOWMAN, JR. v. IDDON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00520
Plaintiff: JOHN J. BOWMAN, JR.
Defendant: KIMBERLY IDDON , KAREN F. COPELAND , RITA C. BARNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOWMAN v. IDDON et al
as 1:2012cv02035
Plaintiff: JOHN J. BOWMAN, JR.
Defendant: KIMBERLY IDDON, KAREN F. COPELAND, RITA C. BARNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BROOKS v. HOGSTEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01788
Petitioner: WILLIAM R. BROOKS
Respondent: KAREN F. HOGSTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LONG v. STEVENS
as 1:2011mc00120
Plaintiff: KAREN F. LONG
Defendant: BOBBY STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG v. SARLES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00395
Plaintiff: KAREN F. LONG
Defendant: RICHARD SARLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG v. CUSHENBERRY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02340
Plaintiff: KAREN F. LONG
Defendant: KENT CUSHENBERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG v. LANIER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02108
Plaintiff: KAREN F. LONG
Defendant: CATHY LANIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG v. BROWN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02104
Plaintiff: KAREN F. LONG
Defendant: DAYNE BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG v. KIRLAND We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02107
Plaintiff: KAREN F. LONG
Defendant: KATHLEEN KIRLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?