Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00753
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3325 M STREET, LLC v. POGGENPOHL US, INC.
as 1:2020cv02873
Plaintiff:
3325 M STREET, LLC
Defendant:
POGGENPOHL US, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Livingsocial Marketing
as 13-7062
In Re:
In re: Livingsocial Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation- Mdl No. 2254
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Melissa Forshey, Who resides at 930 M Street, NW, Washington DC, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Mandy Miller, on behalf of Herself and all others similarly situated, Kimberly Pullman, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and the general public and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Living Social, Inc., Jack's Canoes & Kayaks, LLC, doing business as Jack's Boathouse, Does, 1-100 and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
Michelle Melton and Cery Perle
In re: Livingsocial Marketing
as 13-7059
In Re:
In re: Livingsocial Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation- Mdl No. 2254
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Melissa Forshey, Who resides at 930 M Street, NW, Washington DC, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Mandy Miller, on behalf of Herself and all others similarly situated, Kimberly Pullman, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and the general public and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Living Social, Inc., Jack's Canoes & Kayaks, LLC, doing business as Jack's Boathouse, Does, 1-100 and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
Jeremy De La Garza
MILLENNIUM SQUARE RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATION v. 2200 M STREET LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01632
Plaintiff:
MILLENNIUM SQUARE RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
2200 M STREET LLC, MILLENNIUM WASHINGTON COMMERCIAL TRUST, MILLENNIUM CAF II LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
