Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-1225
Petitioner:
Wilmington, Delaware, Chevy Chase Village, Maryland, Minneapolis, MN and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Westmoreland Mining Holdings L v. EPA, et al
as 19-1176
Petitioner:
Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
Intervenor:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Center for Biological Diversity, City of Boulder and others
Biogenic CO2 Coalition v. EPA, et al
as 19-1185
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler and Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
Biogenic CO2 Coalition
Amicus Curiae:
City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
Intervenor:
Center for Biological Diversity, Clean Air Council, Natural Resources Defense Council and others
Natl. Alliance of Forest Owner v. EPA, et al
as 15-1478
Petitioner:
National Alliance of Forest Owners
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
National League of Cities, United States Conference of Mayors, Baltimore, MD and others
The North American Coal Corp. v. EPA, et al
as 15-1451
Petitioner:
The North American Coal Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, National League of Cities, United States Conference of Mayors and others
Indiana Utility Group v. EPA, et al
as 15-1459
Petitioner:
Indiana Utility Group
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, National League of Cities, United States Conference of Mayors and others
The Kansas City Board v. EPA
as 15-1442
Petitioner:
The Kansas City Board of Public Utilities-- Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
National League of Cities, United States Conference of Mayors, Baltimore, MD and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
City of Los Angeles, Department of Water and Power
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
State of Oklahoma, et al v. EPA
as 15-1364
Not Yet Classified:
Catholic Climate Covenant, ; Catholic Rural Life; Evangelical Environmental Network; National Council of Churches USA; Coalition on the Environment and Jewish Life; Church World Service; Union of Reform Judaism; Women of Reform Judaism; National Bapt, Don J. Easterbrook, Gordon J. Fulks and others
Amicus Curiae:
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, Loggers Association of Northern California, Boulder County, CO and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality and State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Mike Hunter
WHITLEY v. NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES
as 1:2011cv00448
Plaintiff:
CHARLESTON E. WHITLEY
Defendant:
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
