Cases 1 - 10 of 114
SCHUMIN v. NEWLANE REAL ESTATE, INC.
as 1:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
BEN SCHUMIN
Defendant:
NEWLANE REAL ESTATE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RAHMANI et al v. YELLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
MIR RAHMAN RAHMANI, HAJI AJMAL RAHMANI, OZEAN IMMOBILIEN PROJEKTENTWICKLUNG VERWALTUNGS-GMBH and others
Defendant:
JANET YELLEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, BRADLEY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
MARKOS v. COMPASS REAL ESTATE, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02661
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LAMONT MARKOS
Defendant:
COMPASS REAL ESTATE, LLC, JENNIFER TOUCHETTE and COMPASS REAL ESTATE, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
HOWARTH v. MCFADDEN PARTNERS et al
as 1:2023cv01964
Plaintiff:
MORGAN HOWARTH
Defendant:
MCFADDEN PARTNERS, MARK MCFADDEN, HUNTER MCFADDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
REAL WORLD MEDIA LLC v. DAILY CALLER, INC.
as 1:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
REAL WORLD MEDIA LLC
Defendant:
DAILY CALLER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01831
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CHESTNUT v. AMERIS BANK CORPORATION et al
as 1:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
DEMONE A. CHESTNUT
Defendant:
AMERIS BANK CORPORATION and WHITECREST REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
