Cases 1 - 10 of 24
WILLIAMS v. T-MOBILE USA INC.
as 1:2024cv02555
Defendant:
T-MOBILE USA INC.
Plaintiff:
KAWANA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
LEON et al v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02397
Plaintiff:
RICHARD INZA, MICHAEL INZA and RAY LEON
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. KENNARD, JOHN STANKEY, SRINIVASAN GOPALAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02395
Defendant:
AT&T SERVICES, INC., RAPHAEL KUBLER, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 24-1225
Petitioner:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
NLRB v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 23-1002
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
NLRB v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 22-1309
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. NLRB
as 22-1310
Petitioner:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. NLRB
as 22-1275
Petitioner:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
GOSOLAR LLC v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
as 1:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
GOSOLAR and GOSOLAR LLC
Defendant:
T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
