Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2019cv01555
Plaintiff:
HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER
Defendant:
U. S. MARSHALS SERVICE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
OLADOKUN v. CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT FACILITY, et al
as 1:2013cv00358
Plaintiff:
OLADAYO ADELEKE OLADOKUN
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT FACILITY , D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehic
SHABBAN v. U. S. MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 1:2009cv00927
Plaintiff:
KHALED M. RASHAD SHABBAN
Defendant:
U. S. MARSHALS SERVICE, WARDEN and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01300
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GLASS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2008cv00647
Plaintiff:
LEIGH-DAVIS GLASS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, U. S. MARSHAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BEANE v. U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2007cv01711
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL BEANE
Respondent:
U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDERS SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and U. S. MARSHAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JONES v. U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2007cv01712
Petitioner:
MILTON JONES
Respondent:
U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and U. S. MARSHAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2007cv01377
Plaintiff:
PHILLIPE L. SMITH
Defendant:
ANTHONY WILLIAMS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEVON BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
