Cases 1 - 10 of 17
ALLIANCE OF LEGAL CANNABIS ENTITIES-DC, LLC v. KHOPKINS LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02961
Defendant:
REN SHOA-SHENG, YANA CREATIVES LLC, PRIDE SMOKE SHOP LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALLIANCE OF LEGAL CANNABIS ENTITIES-DC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
William Church, et al v. USA, et al
as 23-5192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William L. A. Church
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ku Klux Klan, (KKK), Ku Klux Klan GEK, Gek Church and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, J. Edgar Hoover, Dir. FBI, (1966-1972) and others
WHITE HOUSE GIFT SHOP, INC. et al v. KENNETH TABOH
as 1:2022cv03585
Plaintiff:
THE WHITE HOUSE GIFT SHOP, INC., GIANNINI STRATEGIC ENTERPRISES, LLC and WHITE HOUSE GIFT SHOP, INC.
Defendant:
KENNETH TABOH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
CAR SHOPS AT THE COLUMBIA, LLC v. COLUMBIA RESIDENCES CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS' ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2022cv03220
Plaintiff:
CAR SHOPS AT THE COLUMBIA, LLC
Defendant:
COLUMBIA RESIDENCES CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS' ASSOCIATION and RESIDENTIAL COUNCIL OF THE COLUMBIA RESIDENCES CONDOMINIUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CENTERS, INC.v. RECONCRE, LLC
as 1:2020cv02551
Defendant:
RECONCRE, LLC
Plaintiff:
International Council of Shopping Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
MARTIN v. KOMBA'S AUTO SHOP
as 1:2019cv00416
Plaintiff:
DANNETTE MARTIN
Defendant:
KOMBA'S AUTO SHOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EN FUEGO TOBACCO SHOP LLC et al v. UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2018cv01797
Plaintiff:
TEXAS CIGAR MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION, EN FUEGO TOBACCO SHOP LLC, CUBA LIBRE ENTERPRISES LLC and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ERIC D. HARGAN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
PUBLIC HEALTH LAW CENTER, AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Confederated Tribes, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 15-5033
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clark County, Washington, In case no.: 13-cv-850, City of Vancouver, Washington, In case no.: 13-cv-850, Citizens Against Reservation Shopping (Cars), In case no.: 13-cv-850 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sally Jewell, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, Kevin K. Washburn, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs of the United States Department of the Interior, Stanley M. Speaks, in his official capacity as Regional Director, Northwest Region, of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Cowlitz Indian Tribe, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
Confederated Tribes of the Gr v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 14-5326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Clark County, Washington, In case no.: 13-cv-850, City of Vancouver, Washington, In case no.: 13-cv-850, Citizens Against Reservation Shopping (Cars), In case no.: 13-cv-850 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sally Jewell, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, Kevin K. Washburn, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs of the United States Department of the Interior, Stanley M. Speaks, in his official capacity as Regional Director, Northwest Region, of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Cowlitz Indian Tribe, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
MASTER SALES, LLC v. ZAKOUR et al
as 1:2014cv01845
Defendant:
HOOKAH PLUS, SEVEN STARS WHOLSALE, LLC, YOUSEF HAIDAR and others
Plaintiff:
MASTER SALES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
