Cases 41 - 50 of 177
Daniel v. US
as 21-1290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY PUDNEY and D.R. DANIEL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Daniel v. US
as 21-1289
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PUDNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
D.R. DANIEL
Blake v. US
as 21-1250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY NIKKEL, DANIEL COURSON, LAWRENCE DANIELS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Donald v. US
as 21-1198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BONNIE MEEDER, DANIEL MCCARTHY, CHAN YI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Young v. US
as 21-1192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY C. WATSON, et al., BELLA LIANG, BONNIE ROSE SINGH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Haggart v. US
as 21-1072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBLOIS PROPERTIES, LLC, c/o David and Debra Deblois, FREDERICK P. MILLER, PBI ENTERPRISES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HAGGART and KATHY HAGGART, Husband and Wife, For Themselves and As Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Haggart v. US
as 21-1073
Plaintiff:
KELLY J. SATHER, PATRICIA STRANG, TWOSONS LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE LYNN WOODLEY and GORDON ARTHUR WOODLEY, Personal Counsel for Kittinger Deed Claimants
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Mankaruse v. Intel Corporation
as 20-2297
Defendant / Appellee:
INTEL CORPORATION, DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE, MATTHEW ROBERT HULSE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAGUI MANKARUSE
Nelson v. Preleski
as 20-2283
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES ROVELLA, Commissioner of the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, JAMES L. CETRAN, Chief of the Wethersfield Police Department, in their official capacity, BRIAN PRELESKI, State Attorney for the Judicial District of New Britain Superior Court, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN DANIEL NELSON
Valenzuela v. Wilkie
as 20-1968
Claimant:
DANIEL C. VALENZUELA
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
