Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Marshall v. DVA
as 24-1330
Petitioner:
JACQUELINE MARSHALL
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Jackson v. McDonough
as 23-2366
Claimant:
MARSHALL JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Dempsey v. United States Marshals Service
as 22-1665
Petitioner:
ROBERT JEFF DEMPSEY and AFGE LOCAL 2272
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
In re: Marshall
as 21-1425
Appellant:
In re: KEVIN LEON MARSHALL, SEAN M. MCSWEENEY and ALEXANDER VILLACORTA
Appellee:
ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
In re: Marshall
as 21-1426
Appellant:
In re: KEVIN LEON MARSHALL, ALEXANDER VILLACORTA and DAVID J. DEMELLO
Appellee:
ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Lefevre v. US
as 21-1254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL LEFEVRE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Akpeneye v. US
as 20-1622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. CUMMINGS, CHARLES DELUGO, KEVIN TINDAL, SR. and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ALLEN and SALI ALPHAEK, et al.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Big Oak Farms, Inc. v. US
as 19-1748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAURA B. MEEK FOR JANET BONDURANT Q-TIP TRUST, SAMMIE L. PONDER, LESLIE FOX FARMS, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
MARTY HUTCHISON, TERRY HEQUENBOURG, BURKE LAND CO. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
MARSHALL V DVA
as 11-7027
Claimant-Appellant:
David R. Marshall
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
MARSHALL PATENT V US SOUTH
as 11-1011
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Marshall Patent Holdings, LLC, Marshall Patent Holdings, LLC, Marshall Patent Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant-Appellee:
U.S. South Communications, Inc., U.S. South Communications, Inc., U.S. South Communications, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
