Cases 11 - 20 of 20
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT V US
as 03-5127
Plaintiff-Appellant:
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION,acting through its Duke Power Div., EMPRESA NACIONAL DEL URANIO, S.A. and others
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
TODD V US
as 03-5120
Plaintiff-Appellant:
ANDREW PAUL RANKIN, BENJAMIN E. ABEYTA, BRENDA LOUISE PERRY and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATION
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
PACIFIC GIANT V US
as 03-1254
Defendant-Appellee:
BOB ODOM, COMMISSIONER and UNITED STATES
Plaintiff-Appellant:
OCEAN DUKE CORP., PACIFIC GIANT, INC. and WORLDWIDE LINK, INC.
HUAIYIN FOREIGN TRADE V US
as 02-1484
Plaintiff-Appellant:
BOSTON SEAFOOD PROCESSORS, INC., CAPTAIN CHARLIE SEAFOOD WHOLESALE CO., USA, GMRI, INC. and others
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
MADEY V DUKE UNIVERSITY
as 02-1455
Defendant-Appellant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff-Appellee:
JOHN M.J. MADEY
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT V US
as 02-5012
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION, EMPRESA NACIONAL DEL URANIO, S.A. and others
Defendant-Appellant:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES and others
MADEY V DUKE UNIVERSITY
as 01-1567
Defendant-Appellee:
DUKE UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff-Appellant:
JOHN M.J. MADEY
CONTESSA FOOD V CONAGRA
as 01-1157
Defendant-Appellant:
CONAGRA, INC. (dba Singleton Shrimp Co and Meridian Product), MERIDIAN SEAFOOD PRODUCTS, INC., OCEAN DUKE CORP. and others
Plaintiff-Appellee:
CONTESSA FOOD PRODUCTS, INC. (fka ZB Industries Inc.), CONTESSA FOOD PRODUCTS, INC. (fka ZB Industries Inc.) and CONTESSA FOOD PRODUCTS, INC. (fka ZB Industries Inc.)
DUKES V USPS
as 01-3002
Petitioner:
ROBERT C. DUKES, ROBERT C. DUKES and ROBERT C. DUKES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
