Cases 11 - 20 of 133
Pirkkala v. MSPB
as 22-1941
Petitioner:
STEVEN P. PIRKKALA
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Jackson v. US
as 22-1276
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GLORIA J. JACKSON, DAVID ALCANTARA, SHEYLAH ALCIDE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
In re: Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd.
as 22-115
Petitioner:
In re: SHENZHEN SENIOR TECHNOLOGY MATERIAL CO. LTD. and XIAOMIN (STEVEN) ZHANG
Respondent:
CELGARD, LLC
YuIn re: Yu
as 22-1211
Appellant:
In re: STEVEN SOUNYOUNG YU and SOUNIL YU
Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Olsen v. US
as 21-2034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE HOPE DAVIS, OMAR CANO, BRUCE OLSEN and others
Plaintiff:
ANNA GRIFFITH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Bakalovic v. US
as 21-1890
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA WHITSON, GABRIELLE STROUT, BEVERLY BUGLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Ideker Farms, Inc. v. US
as 21-1875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ADKINS, JR., ROBERT ADKINS, SR., GERALD SCHNEIDER, dba Buffalo Hollow Farms, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
MARY SCHNEIDER, et al., LYNN BINDER, TODD BINDER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Ideker Farms, Inc. v. US
as 21-1849
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VALERIE BINDER, CHARLES GARST, individually and, dba Garst Farms, Inc., GAIL CUNNINGHAM, dba Cunningham Farms, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Cross Appellant:
ESTATE OF BETTY ADKINS, ROBERT ADKINS, JR., ESTATE OF ROBERT ADKINS, SR. and others
Bruzos v. US
as 21-1195
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN HITE, DAVID SHARP, SANDIARTA KURNIAWAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Lightforce USA, Inc. v. Leupold & Stevens, Inc.
as 21-1169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HVRT CORP. and LIGHTFORCE USA, INC., dba Nightforce Optics, dba Nightforce USA
Defendant / Appellee:
LEUPOLD & STEVENS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
