Cases 31 - 40 of 55
MCKENZIE V DVA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 08-7086
Claimant-Appellant:
Arthur Y. McKenzie
Respondent-Appellee:
James B. Peake, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs
WONG V DVA
as 07-7009
Claimant-Appellee:
Ho Y. Wong
Respondent-Appellant:
James B. Peake, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs
JUDD V US DISTRICT COURT WD/TX
as 06-1232
Defendant-Appellee:
Karen Y. Grey-Steele, L. Stuart Platt, U.S. Magistrate, Karen Y. Grey-Steele and others
CARROLL-HARRIS V VA
as 06-3080
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Petitioner:
JENNIFER Y. CARROLL-HARRIS, JENNIFER Y. CARROLL-HARRIS and JENNIFER Y. CARROLL-HARRIS
TAMPOC V DVA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 06-7022
Claimant-Appellant:
ATILANA Y. TAMPOC, ATILANA Y. TAMPOC and ATILANA Y. TAMPOC
Respondent-Appellee:
R. JAMES NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, R. JAMES NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and R. JAMES NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
MCCALL-SCOVENS V MSPB
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 05-3238
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD:
Petitioner:
VERONICA Y. MCCALL-SCOVENS
GRAVELY V DVA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 07-7205
Claimant-Appellant:
Alvin Y. Gravely
Respondent-Appellee:
James B. Peake, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs
MORRIS V US
as 04-5129
Plaintiff-Appellant:
ESTILL C. HOWARD, GERALD V. HOWARD, OTIS P. MORRIS and others
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.