Cases 41 - 50 of 466
Bonner v. McDonough
as 21-1817
Claimant:
MARK H. BONNER
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Koopmann v. US
as 21-1746
Plaintiff:
EUGENE R. BISCAILUZ, JAMES H. BIESTEK, ROBERT L. BEAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM ROYALL, JR.
Avalos v. US
as 21-119
Respondent:
THOMAS RHINEHART, JR., JASON DIGNAN, JOSEPH AUGUSTA and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES
Haggart v. US
as 21-1681
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBLOIS PROPERTIES, LLC, c/o David and Debra Deblois, FREDERICK P. MILLER, PBI ENTERPRISES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WESTPOINT PROPERTIES, LLC, C/O FARAMARZ GHODDOUSSI, WILLIAM AMES, DENISE LYNN WOODLEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Haggart v. US
as 21-1684
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTPOINT PROPERTIES, LLC, C/O FARAMARZ GHODDOUSSI, KATHY HAGGART, Husband and Wife, For Themselves and As Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons, WILLIAM AMES and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA STRANG, TWOSONS LLC, GORDON ARTHUR WOODLEY, Personal Counsel for Kittinger Deed Claimants and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Haggart v. US
as 21-1658
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA STRANG, TWOSONS LLC, WESTPOINT PROPERTIES, LLC, C/O FARAMARZ GHODDOUSSI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STAR L. EVANS and STAR EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Haggart v. US
as 21-1659
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CLEVELAND SQUARE, LLC, GRETCHEN CHAMBERS, ALISON L. WEBB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Haggart v. US
as 21-1660
Plaintiff:
KELLY J. SATHER, PATRICIA STRANG, TWOSONS LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE LYNN WOODLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
TaylorIn re: Taylor
as 21-1613
Appellant:
In re: LAWNIE H. TAYLOR
Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
