Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Burger v. US
as 24-1249
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BASIL AGAPION, SOPHIA S. AGAPION, KATHE BURGER and others
Plaintiff:
GUILFORD BUILDERS SUPPLY CO.
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Chapman Spring/Garden, LLC v. US
as 24-1250
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHAPMAN SPRING/GARDEN, LLC, CHANEY-FRYE #4, LLC, D.S. CHANEY PROPERTIES #6, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
ATS Ford Drive Investment, LLC v. US
as 23-1760
Plaintiff:
ATS FORD DRIVE INVESTMENT, LLC, ALEXANDER AUTO AND RADIATOR REPAIR, RONALD MORRIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GODBY PROPERTIES, LP, REZIN FAMILY INVESTMENTS LLS, Greenstone Asset Management, c/o, BRIAN L. SCHOONVELD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Bangkok Bangkok Import & Export Inc. v. 2M Associates, Inc.
as 22-1584
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BANGKOK BANGKOK IMPORT & EXPORT INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
2M ASSOCIATES, INC. and ALPHA BAH
Jackson v. US
as 22-1276
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GLORIA J. JACKSON, DAVID ALCANTARA, SHEYLAH ALCIDE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Olsen v. US
as 21-2034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE HOPE DAVIS, OMAR CANO, BRUCE OLSEN and others
Plaintiff:
ANNA GRIFFITH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Filler v. US
as 21-1552
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON GERSHON FILLER, as an individual and on behalf of Neurografix-Sole Proprietorship, NEUROGRAFIX, IMAGE-BASED SURGICENTER CORPORATION and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Banes v. US
as 21-1529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUGUETTE BLACK, CARLOS MAZAS, GEORGE MANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Meadows on Memorial Owners v. US
as 21-1214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAWAL KAREAH, XINDI BENAVENTE, KIMBERLY BOOTH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
John Bean Technologies Corp. v. Morris & Associates, Inc.
as 20-1148
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellant:
MORRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
