Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Barlow v. US
as 22-1381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM E. BARLOW, TWILA L. BARLOW, REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Jackson v. US
as 22-1276
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GLORIA J. JACKSON, DAVID ALCANTARA, SHEYLAH ALCIDE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Spence v. McDonough
as 22-1105
Claimant:
BETTY SPENCE
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Ideker Farms, Inc. v. US
as 21-1875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ADKINS, JR., ROBERT ADKINS, SR., GERALD SCHNEIDER, dba Buffalo Hollow Farms, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
MARY SCHNEIDER, et al., LYNN BINDER, TODD BINDER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Ideker Farms, Inc. v. US
as 21-1849
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VALERIE BINDER, CHARLES GARST, individually and, dba Garst Farms, Inc., GAIL CUNNINGHAM, dba Cunningham Farms, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Cross Appellant:
ESTATE OF BETTY ADKINS, ROBERT ADKINS, JR., ESTATE OF ROBERT ADKINS, SR. and others
Bettis-Taylor v. US
as 21-1456
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIRELL F. BETTIS-TAYLOR, aka Kirell Bettis
Cartmell v. US
as 21-1252
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BETTY CARTMELL, LAUREN E. LABORDE and WILLIAM T. LABORDE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Shoffiett v. Goode
as 20-1368
Defendant:
JIM GOODE, SR.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKE D. SHOFFIETT, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
BETTY GOODE, Individually and as Executrix on behalf of the Estate of Dale Goode, DALE GOODE, MARY GOODE and others
Baby Trend, Inc. v. Wonderland Nurserygoods Co.
as 19-2309
Appellant:
BABY TREND, INC., BETTY TSAI and DENNY TSAI
Appellee:
WONDERLAND NURSERYGOODS CO., LTD.
BYWATERS V US
as 11-1032
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Ashburn Bywaters, Betty L. Hohenberger, Carl Lancaster and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States, United States and United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
