Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Barlow v. US
as 22-1381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM E. BARLOW, TWILA L. BARLOW, REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Azar v. US
as 21-1222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHEILA SULLIVAN, TIMOTHY BUNDA, MARGARET C. WILSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
GASTON V DVA
as 09-7104
Claimant-Appellant:
Chester R. Gaston
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
1ST HOME LIQUIDATING TRUST V US
as 08-5050
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
1st Home Liquidating Trust, Everette E. Mills, III, Roger P. Kavanagh, Jr. and others
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Alan D. Cohn, Albert S. Lineberry, Sr., Alice W. Thomason and others
Defendant-Appellant:
United States
SIMMONS V DVA
as 08-7017
Claimant-Appellant:
Chester P. Simmons
Appellee:
James B. Peake, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs
KRAUSE V KRAUSE PUBLICATIONS
as 07-1364
Appellant:
Chester L. Krause
Appellee:
Krause Publications, Inc.
WOPSOCK V NATCHEES
as 05-1494
Defendant-Appellee:
ALLEN ANSPACH, in his official capacity as Acting Reg. Dir., B.I.A, CHESTER D. MILLS, in his indiv capacity and in his official, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary of the Interior and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
CASSANDRA KOCHAMP, LUKE J. DUNCAN and RONALD J. WOPSOCK
WOPSOCK V NATCHEES
as 05-1298
Plaintiff-Appellant:
CASSANDRA KOCHAMP, LUKE J. DUNCAN and RONALD J. WOPSOCK
Defendant-Appellee:
CHESTER D. MILLS, in his indiv capacity and in his official CAPACITY, DAVID W. ANDERSON, Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs, GALE A. NORTON, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR and others
BUTTS V DVA
as 05-7072
Claimant-Appellee:
Chester L. Butts
Respondent-Appellant:
James B. Peake, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs
BROCKINGTON V DVA
as 05-7068
Claimant-Appellee:
Chester Brockington
Respondent-Appellant:
James B. Peake, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
