Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Barnes v. US
as 24-1169
Plaintiff: CLIFFORD KEETON BARNES and PAUL W. NIBUR
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES A. GROSSWILER
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Noll v. US
as 24-1174
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLIFFORD L. NOLL
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Adams v. US
as 23-2269
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHARLES M. ADAMS, JAMES R. ALLEN, LOUIS C. ATKINS and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Lowe v. Shieldmark, Inc.
as 23-1893
Plaintiff / Appellee: CLIFFORD A. LOWE and SPOTA LLC, fka Insite Solutions, LLC
Defendant / Appellant: SHIELDMARK, INC., ADVANCED PLASTICS, INC. and CROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
Lowe v. Shieldmark, Inc.
as 23-1871
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLIFFORD A. LOWE and SPOTA LLC, fka Insite Solutions, LLC
Defendant / Cross Appellant: SHIELDMARK, INC., ADVANCED PLASTICS, INC. and CROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
Lowe v. Shieldmark, Inc.
as 23-1786
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLIFFORD A. LOWE and SPOTA LLC, fka Insite Solutions, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: SHIELDMARK, INC., ADVANCED PLASTICS, INC. and CROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
Lowe v. Shieldmark, Inc.
as 22-2273
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLIFFORD A. LOWE and INSITE SOLUTIONS, LLC, nka Spota LLC
Defendant / Appellee: SHIELDMARK, INC., ADVANCED PLASTICS, INC. and CROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
City of Fresno v. US
as 22-1994
Plaintiff / Appellant: CITY OF FRESNO, ARVIN-EDISON WATER STORAGE DISTRICT, CHOWCHILLA WATER DISTRICT and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES, SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT and others
Moffett v. McDonough
as 22-1183
Claimant: CLIFFORD M. MOFFETT
Respondent / Appellee: DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Hilaire v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2295
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLIFFORD HILAIRE
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?