Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company v. Secretary of the Air Force
as 22-1035
Appellant:
LOCKHEED MARTIN AERONAUTICS COMPANY
Appellee:
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE
ZOLTEK CORP V US
as 09-5135
Amicus Curiae:
Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc., Federal Circuit Bar Association and United States
Defendant-Appellant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Zoltek Corporation
AIR FORCE V LOCKHEED MARTIN
as 09-1261
Appellee:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Appellant:
Michael B. Donley, Secretary of the Air Force
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL V US
as 08-5181
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Honeywell Intellectual Properties, Inc. and Honeywell International Inc.
Defendant-Appellee:
L-3 Communications Corporation, Lockheed Martin Corporation and United States
AXIOM RESOURCE V US
as 08-5072
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Axiom Resource Management, Inc.
Defendant-Appellant:
Lockheed Martin Federal Healthcare, Inc. and United States
AIR FORCE V LOCKHEED MARTIN
as 08-1056
Appellee:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Appellant:
Michael W. Wynne, Secretary of the Air Force
SPACE SYSTEMS V LOCKHEED MARTIN
as 04-1501
Defendant-Appellee:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Plaintiff-Appellant:
SPACE SYSTEMS/LORAL, INC.
LOCKHEED MARTIN V NAVY
as 04-1461
Appellee:
GORDON R. ENGLAND, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
Appellant:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP V US
as 02-5042
Plaintiff-Appellant:
LOCKHEED MARTIN ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC., LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, LOCKHEED MARTIN ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES and others
NORTHROP GRUMMAN V US
as 02-5019
Plaintiff-Appellant:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION NAVAL ELECTRONICS AND SERVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION NAVAL ELECTRONICS AND SERVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION NAVAL ELECTRONICS AND SERVEILLANCE SYSTEMS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
