Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Nation v. US
as 22-1256
Plaintiff:
MARK WAYNE NATION, MICHAEL JOE HORTON, KENNETH DESHAWN EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD RODRICK MACDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Miller v. McDonough
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 22-1240
Claimant:
RUDOLPH V. MILLER
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
IN RE COCHRAN
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 11-1225
Appellee:
David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Appellant:
Gary D. Cochran, Rosemary Bergsma and Rudolph Bergsma
AUGUST TECH CORP V CAMTEK LTD
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-1458
Plaintiff-Appellee:
August Technology Corporation, Rudolph Technologies, Inc., August Technology Corporation and others
Defendant-Appellant:
Camtek, Ltd., Camtek, Ltd., Camtek, Ltd. and others
RHABURN V US
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-5017
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Rudolph Rhaburn, Rudolph Rhaburn, Rudolph Rhaburn and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States, United States, United States and others
SMITH V DVA
as 05-7080
Respondent-Appellee:
R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
RUDOLPH SMITH
MURRAY V MSPB
as 01-3226
Intervenor:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD and MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Petitioner:
RUDOLPH M. MURRAY, JR., RUDOLPH M. MURRAY, JR. and RUDOLPH M. MURRAY, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.