Cases 1 - 10 of 18
New U Life Corporation v. ITC
as 20-1214
Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Appellant:
NEW U LIFE CORPORATION
ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR V PTO
as 10-1406
Amicus Curiae:
AARP, Alliance for Humane Biotechnology, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Defendant-Appellant:
Arnold B. Combe, Director, University of Utah Research Foundation, David W. Pershing, Director, University of Utah Research Foundation, Jack Brittain, Director, University of Utah Research Foundation and others
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Arupa Ganguly, PhD, Boston Women's Health Book Collective, Breast Cancer Action and others
BEER V US
as 10-5012
Plaintiff-Appellant:
A. Wallace Tashima, Judge, James Robertson, Judge, Laurence Silberman, Judge and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States, United States, United States and others
1ST HOME LIQUIDATING TRUST V US
as 08-5050
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
1st Home Liquidating Trust, Everette E. Mills, III, Roger P. Kavanagh, Jr. and others
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Alan D. Cohn, Albert S. Lineberry, Sr., Alice W. Thomason and others
Defendant-Appellant:
United States
HUGHES V DVA
as 07-7081
Appellee:
Gordon H. Mansfield, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
Thomas U. Hughes
PLANTE V DVA
as 06-7281
Claimant-Appellant:
Maurice U. Plante
Respondent-Appellee:
R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
ARNDT V MOKAI MFG
as 06-1380
Defendant-Appellee:
Mokai Manufacturing, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Raymond U. Arndt
SMITH V DVA
as 06-7083
Claimant-Appellant:
Charles U. Smith, Charles U. Smith and Charles U. Smith
Respondent-Appellee:
R. JAMES NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, R. JAMES NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and R. JAMES NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
RETAMAL V US CUSTOMS
as 05-1332
Sanctioned Party-Appellant:
JOHN J. GALVIN
Plaintiff-Appellant:
SERGIO U. RETAMAL
Defendant-Appellee:
United States Customs and Border Protection
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
