Cases 41 - 50 of 53
GARTON et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00356
Petitioner:
APRIL L GARTON , JEREMIAH R CASMIRE, Sr. and JEREMIAH R CASMIRE, Jr.
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
SANTIAGO et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00342
Petitioner:
ADEENA SANTIAGO , ERICK SANTIAGO, Sr. and ERICK SANTIAGO, Jr.
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
WEBER et al v. USA
as 1:2011cv00338
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P. WEBER , ALBERT ACOSTA , CORY R. ACOSTA and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
EMMONS ,SR. v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00211
Petitioner:
JERRY W EMMONS ,SR.
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
HAIRSTON v. USA
as 1:2011cv00136
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR L. HAIRSTON, Sr.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
WHITING v. USA
as 1:2010cv00775
Plaintiff:
JAMES FRANKLIN WHITING, SR
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
DAVIS et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00615
Petitioner:
MELISSA DAVIS , CECIL DAVIS, SR.., and CECIL DAVIS, JR
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
RICHARD et al v. USA
as 1:2010cv00503
Plaintiff:
JAMES RICHARD, SR. and JON WHIRLWIND HORSE
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
ZAPPLEY v. USA
as 1:2010cv00299
Plaintiff:
DONALD W. ZAPPLEY, SR.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
BATISTE et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2009vv00683
Petitioner:
DESHANNA BATISTE, BRAD ANTHONY BATISTE, SR and BRENNAN ANTONIO BATISTE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
