Cases 11 - 20 of 48
ARCHIBALD-ROMERO v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00109
Petitioner:
TAYLOR ARCHIBALD-ROMERO
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
TAYLOR v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00092
Petitioner:
FOLASHADE TAYLOR
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
DEATRICK v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00044
Petitioner:
TAYLOR DEATRICK
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
TAYLOR v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01918
Petitioner:
TIFFANY TAYLOR
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
TAYLOR v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01414
Petitioner:
MARGUERITE TAYLOR
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
TAYLOR v. USA
as 1:2022cv01202
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
TAYLOR v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01098
Petitioner:
JOANNE S. TAYLOR
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
TAYLOR v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00722
Petitioner:
SELMA TAYLOR
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
TAYLOR v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00545
Petitioner:
VIOLA TAYLOR
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022vv00535
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
