Other Statutes Cases filed in the United States Federal Claims Court
Cases 31 - 40 of 40
QUIGLEY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00756
Petitioner: SARAH QUIGLEY
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
TOOR et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00650
Petitioner: PAUL TOOR, CATHERINE TOOR and SARAH TOOR
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
CRANER et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00475
Petitioner: JIM CRANER, SARAH CRANER and MACY CRANER
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
CHERMAK v. USA
as 1:2010cv00452
Plaintiff: SARAH MARIE CHERMAK
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
DAVIDSON et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00327
Petitioner: SARAH DAVIDSON
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
WALTNER et al v. USA
as 1:2010cv00225
Plaintiff: STEVEN T. WALTNER and SARAH V. WALTNER
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
SMITH et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00185
Petitioner: SARAH SMITH , RONALD SMITH and DYLAN SMITH
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
JACKSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00089
Petitioner: SARAH ELIZABETH JACKSON
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
BAHNSEN et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2009vv00624
Petitioner: ERIC BAHNSEN , JAN BAHNSEN and SARAH BAHNSEN
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
ROSALES, et al v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:1998cv00860
Plaintiff: WALTER ROSALES , ALL PLAINTIFFS , SARAH ALDAMAS and others
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?