Cases 1 - 10 of 71
MARTINS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00375
Petitioner:
JOSEPH MARTINS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MARTIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00254
Petitioner:
EMMA LEE MARTIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MARTIN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
DONALD LYNN MARTIN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
MARTIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv02106
Petitioner:
DEBORAH MARTIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MARTIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01649
Petitioner:
MELVIN J. MARTIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
TOLER ATWELL et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01316
Plaintiff:
REGENA J. TOLER ATWELL, HELEN BANREVI doing business as GQ CLEANERS, BRADY HETHERWICK and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BUNDICK et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01036
Plaintiff:
CLINTON L. BUNDICK, DANA T. BUNDICK, BILLY K. EAST and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
MARTIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00801
Petitioner:
NIKKIA MARTIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BARBATA et al
as 1:2023cv00664
Plaintiff:
CHARLES G. BARBATA, BEACOM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, GERHARD P. DRUMM and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
HAMMOND-MARTIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00588
Petitioner:
GLENDINA HAMMOND-MARTIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
