Cases 1 - 10 of 38
ROGERS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00569
Petitioner:
MIRANDA ROGERS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ROGERS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00492
Petitioner:
APRIL ROGERS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
FARRIS v. USA
as 1:2023cv02113
Plaintiff:
ROGER WESLEY FARRIS and ROBERT F. MORELLO, JR.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
TRIUMPH CS HOLDINGS, LLC et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01248
Plaintiff:
TRIUMPH CS HOLDINGS, LLC, ROGER LEROY STOESZ, GCC INTERESTS, LLC doing business as MR. C'S BOAT & RV STORAGE and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ROGERS et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01236
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JOHN ROGERS and ALISON SUDDARTH ROGERS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ROGERS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01156
Petitioner:
RICHARD ROGERS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
EDMUNDSON et al
as 1:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
MELANIE F. EDMUNDSON, MIRANDA S. TODD, PAMELA C. TODD PITTS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BUNDICK et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01036
Plaintiff:
CLINTON L. BUNDICK, DANA T. BUNDICK, BILLY K. EAST and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ROGERS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00695
Petitioner:
SUSAN ROGERS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MILLER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00684
Petitioner:
ROGER M. MILLER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
