Cases 141 - 150 of 1,049
GALAPAGOS-INTELLIDYNE SOLUTIONS, LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv01257
Plaintiff:
GALAPAGOS-INTELLIDYNE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
KARTHIK CONSULTING, LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv00944
Plaintiff:
KARTHIK CONSULTING, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
ZEN STRATEGICS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
INTEROP-ISHPI JV, LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv01266
Plaintiff:
INTEROP-ISHPI JV, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
FLUOR FEDERAL SERVICES, INC. v. USA
as 1:2023cv01013
Plaintiff:
FLUOR FEDERAL SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Consolidated Plaintiff:
CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION
Intervenor Defendant:
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
RSC2, INC. v. USA
as 1:2023cv01275
Plaintiff:
RSC2, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ACCELGOV, LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
ACCELGOV, LLC and ENVISION UNLIMITED SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Consolidated Plaintiff:
SYSTEMS PLUS, INC.
Intervenor Defendant:
ITC-DE, LLC D/B/A DOTIT, A1FEDIMPACT, LLC, NETCENTRIC TECHNOLOGY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SYSTEMS PLUS, INC. v. USA
as 1:2023cv01163
Plaintiff:
SYSTEMS PLUS, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ENVISION UNLIMITED SOLUTIONS, LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv01241
Plaintiff:
ENVISION UNLIMITED SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SYNEREN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION v. USA
as 1:2023cv01099
Plaintiff:
SYNEREN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
ITC-DE, LLC D/B/A DOTIT and NETCENTRIC TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
PARADYME MANAGEMENT, INC v. USA
as 1:2023cv00936
Plaintiff:
PARADYME MANAGEMENT, INC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
VIDOORI, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
