Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Jacki Easlick, LLC v. CJ Emerald
as 24-1826
Plaintiff:
JACKI EASLICK, LLC and JE CORPORATE LLC
Defendant:
CJ EMERALD and ACCENCYC US
AGI Suretrack LLC v. Farmers Edge Inc.
as 24-1830
Plaintiff:
AGI SURETRACK LLC
Defendant:
FARMERS EDGE INC. and FARMERS EDGE (US) INC.
AGI Suretrack LLC v. Farmers Edge Inc.
as 24-1730
Plaintiff:
AGI SURETRACK LLC
Defendant:
FARMERS EDGE INC. and FARMERS EDGE (US) INC.
Jacki Easlick, LLC v. CJ Emerald
as 24-1538
Plaintiff:
JACKI EASLICK, LLC and JE CORPORATE LLC
Defendant:
CJ EMERALD, LITEVISO, ABEL TANG and others
Vitaworks IP, LLC v. Glanbia Nutritionals (NA), Inc.
as 24-1532
Plaintiff:
VITAWORKS IP, LLC and VITAWORKS, LLC
Defendant:
GLANBIA NUTRITIONALS (NA), INC., PRINOVA US LLC and QIANJIANG YONGAN PHARMACEUTICAL CO. LTD.
US Patent No. 7,679,637 LLC v. Google LLC
as 24-1520
Plaintiff:
US PATENT NO. 7,679,637 LLC
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
ABC Corporation I v. Partnership And Unincorporated Associations
as 24-1471
Plaintiff:
ABC CORPORATION I, ABC CORPORATION II, EBAY, INC. and others
Defendant:
THE PARTNERSHIP AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE "A", GYROOR US, TOMOLOO OFFICIAL and others
Respondent:
YANJIN-US
Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. v. Partnership And Unincorporated Associations
as 24-1472
Plaintiff:
ABC CORPORATION I, ABC CORPORATION II, EBAY, INC. and others
Defendant:
THE PARTNERSHIP AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE "A", GYROOR US, TOMOLOO OFFICIAL and others
Respondent:
YANJIN-US
Inventist Inc. v. Ninebot Inc. (USA)
as 24-1267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INVENTIST INC. and SHANE CHEN
Defendant / Appellee:
NINEBOT INC. (USA), dba Ninebot US Inc., NINEBOT (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. and NINEBOT INC. (CHINA)
Winfrey v. US Department of Commerce
as 24-1260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EULA WINFREY
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Patent and Trademark Office
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
