Cases 41 - 50 of 73
BLACK & DECKER V ROBERT BOSCH TOOL
as 07-1077
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc. and Black & Decker, Inc.
Defendant-Appellant:
Robert Bosch Tool Corporation
SHAKEPROOF ASSEMBLY V US
as 07-1038
Defendant-Appellant:
Hang Zhou Spring Washer Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Shakeproof Assembly Components Div. of Illinois Tool Works
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
GONNOCCI V THREE M TOOL
as 06-1521
Defendant-Appellee:
Michael A. Medwid, Three M Tool and Machine, Incorporated, Ultra Grip International, Incorporated and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Ralph Gonnocci Revocable Living Trust
R H MURPHY V ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS
as 06-1273
Defendant-Appellee:
Illinois Tool Works, Inc., Illinois Tool Works, Inc. and Illinois Tool Works, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
R.H. Murphy Co., Inc., R.H. Murphy Co., Inc. and R.H. Murphy Co., Inc.
HILDEBRAND V STECK MANUFACTURING
as 06-1120
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
CORNWELL QUALITY TOOLS COMPANY, MAC TOOLS, MATCO TOOLS and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
DAVID L. HILDEBRAND, DAVID L. HILDEBRAND and DAVID L. HILDEBRAND
M EAGLES TOOL V FISHER TOOLING
as 05-1228
Defendant-Appellant:
FISHER TOOLING COMPANY, INC. (dba Astro Pneumatic Tool Co)
M EAGLES TOOL V FISHER TOOLING
as 05-1224
Defendant-Appellant:
FISHER TOOLING COMPANY, INC. (dba Astro Pneumatic Tool Co)
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
M. EAGLES TOOL WAREHOUSE, INC. (dba S&G Tool Aid Corp.)
BOYDS BIT SERV V SPECIALTY RENTAL
as 04-1621
Plaintiff-Appellee:
BOYD'S BIT SERVICE, INC.
Defendant-Appellant:
SPECIALTY RENTAL TOOLS & SUPPLY, INC. (NOW KNOWN AS SPECIALITY RENTAL TOOLS & SUPPLY, L.P.
AIR TURBINE V ATLAS COPCO
as 04-1387
Plaintiff-Appellant:
AIR TURBINE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Defendant-Appellee:
ATLAS COPCO AB, ATLAS COPCO NORTH AMERICA, INC., ATLAS COPCO TOOLS AB and others
SPECIALTY RENTAL V BOYD'S BIT SERV
as 04-1356
Defendant-Appellant:
BOYD'S BIT SERVICE, INC.
Plaintiff-Appellee:
SPECIALTY RENTAL TOOLS & SUPPLY, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
