Cases 11 - 19 of 19
BAUER V CD REPAIRMAN INC
as 04-1044
Plaintiff-Appellant:
AZURADISC, INC. and JASON BAUER
Defendant-Appellee:
CD REPAIRMAN SA, INC., CD REPAIRMAN, INC. and MICHAEL KENNEDY
EPCON GAS V BAUER COMPRESSORS
as 03-1303
Defendant-Appellee:
BAUER COMPRESSORS, INC.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
EPCON GAS SYSTEMS, INC. and NORMAN S. LOREN
ANTON/BAUER V PAG LTD
as 02-1487
Third Party Defendant-Appellee:
ALEX DESORBO
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee:
Anton/Bauer, Incorporated
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant:
PAG, LTD.
IN RE ANTON/BAUER
as 02-1135
Appellant:
ANTON/BAUER, INCORPORATED, ANTON/BAUER, INCORPORATED, ANTON/BAUER, INCORPORATED and others
Appellee:
JAMES E. ROGAN, DIRECTOR, PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, JAMES E. ROGAN, DIRECTOR, PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, JAMES E. ROGAN, DIRECTOR, PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE and others
DEPALMA V NIKE INC
as 01-1589
Plaintiff-Appellant:
BERNARD F. DEPALMA
Defendant-Appellee:
CANSTAR SPORTS GROUP, INC. (nka Bauer Nike Hockey, Inc.), CANSTAR SPORTS USA (nka Bauer Nike Hockey USA), NIKE, INC. and others
EPCON GAS V BAUER COMPRESSORS
as 01-1071
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
BAUER COMPRESSORS, INC., BAUER COMPRESSORS, INC. and BAUER COMPRESSORS, INC.
EPCON GAS V BAUER COMPRESSORS
as 01-1043
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
BAUER COMPRESSORS, INC., BAUER COMPRESSORS, INC. and BAUER COMPRESSORS, INC.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
EPCON GAS SYSTEMS, INC., NORMAN S. LOREN, EPCON GAS SYSTEMS, INC. and others
KOENIG & BAUER-ALBERT V US
as 00-1348
Defendant-Appellee:
GOSS GRAPHICS SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
KBA-MOTTER CORPORATION, KOENIG & BAUER-ALBERT AG and MAN ROLAND DRUCKMASCHINEN AG
KOENIG & BAUER-ALBERT V US
as 00-1387
Defendant-Appellee:
GOSS GRAPHICS SYSTEMS, INC. and UNITED STATES
Plaintiff:
KBA-MOTTER CORPORATION and KOENIG & BAUER-ALBERT AG
Plaintiff-Appellant:
MAN ROLAND DRUCKMASCHINEN AG and MAN ROLAND INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
