Cases 11 - 20 of 58
TIGER TEAM TECH V SYNESI GROUP
as 09-1508
Defendant-Appellee:
Rod Miley and Tim Olish
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Tiger Team Technologies, Inc. (f/k/a Blackwater Tech, Inc)
SANOFI-AVENTIS V SANDOZ INC
as 09-1427
Defendant:
Abraxis Bioscience, Inc. (formerly known as Astrazeneca Phar, Actavis Group hf., Actavis Totowa LLC and others
Defendant-Appellee:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Fresenius Kabi Oncology Plc (f/k/a Dabur Oncology plc), Fresenius Kabi Pharma Limited (f/k/a/ Dabur Pharma Limited) and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Debiopharm S.A., Sanofi-Aventis and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
DAIICHI SANKYO V APOTEX
as 09-1409
Defendant-Appellant:
Apotex Corp. and Apotex, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. (f/k/a Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., and Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. (fka Daiichi Pharmaceutical Corp.)
NATIONAL OILWELL V PASON SYSTEMS
as 09-1398
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
National Oilwell Varco, L.P. (f/k/a Varco L.P.)
NATIONAL OILWELL V PASON SYSTEMS
as 09-1397
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
National Oilwell Varco, L.P. (f/k/a Varco L.P.)
Defendant-Appellant:
Pason Systems USA Corp.
CONSOLIDATION COAL V US
as 09-5083
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Andalex Resources, Inc., Apogee Coal Company, Arch Western Resources, LLC and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
FUJI V BENUN
as 09-1148
Plaintiff-Appellant:
FujiFilm Corporation (f/k/a Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.)
Defendant:
Jack C. Benun
ABBOTT DIABETES V BAYER HEALTH
as 08-1595
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. (f/k/a TheraSense, Inc.)
EXCEL INNOVATIONS V YOU TECHNOLOGY
as 08-1599
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant:
Excel Innovations, Inc.
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee:
Indivos Corporation, Solidus Networks, Inc. and You Technology Inc. (f/k/a YT Acquisition Corporation)
VITA-MIX V BASIC HOLDING
as 08-1517
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
Basic Holding, Inc. (f/k/a Back to Basics Products, Inc.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
