Cases 11 - 20 of 66
LiquidPower Specialty Products Inc. v. Baker Hughes Holdings, LLC
as 22-1153
Appellant:
LIQUIDPOWER SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC., fka Lubrizol Specialty Products, Inc.
Appellee:
BAKER HUGHES HOLDINGS, LLC, fka Baker Hughes, a GE Company, LLC
LiquidPower Specialty Products Inc. v. Baker Hughes Holdings, LLC
as 22-1155
Appellant:
LIQUIDPOWER SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC., fka Lubrizol Specialty Products, Inc.
Appellee:
BAKER HUGHES HOLDINGS, LLC, fka Baker Hughes, a GE Company, LLC
Cox v. McDonough
as 21-2288
Claimant:
HUGH D. COX, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
LiquidPower Specialty Products Inc. v. Baker Hughes Holdings, LLC
as 21-2284
Appellant:
LIQUIDPOWER SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC., fka Lubrizol Specialty Products, Inc.
Appellee:
BAKER HUGHES HOLDINGS, LLC, fka Baker Hughes, a GE Company, LLC
LiquidPower Specialty Products Inc. v. Baker Hughes Holdings, LLC
as 21-2285
Appellant:
LIQUIDPOWER SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC., fka Lubrizol Specialty Products, Inc.
Appellee:
BAKER HUGHES HOLDINGS, LLC, fka Baker Hughes, a GE Company, LLC
LiquidPower Specialty Products Inc. v. Baker Hughes Holdings, LLC
as 21-2283
Appellant:
LIQUIDPOWER SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC., fka Lubrizol Specialty Products, Inc.
Appellee:
BAKER HUGHES HOLDINGS, LLC, fka Baker Hughes, a GE Company, LLC
Sharrock v. US
as 21-1889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHIL S. KO, XUECHEN ZHANG, HYUNIL JO LEE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Arunachalam v. McNamara
as 21-110
Respondent:
RAYMOND C. CLEVENGER, III, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., TODD M. HUGHES and others
Petitioner:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
McKinney v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
as 21-1077
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Petitioner:
HUGH CAMPBELL MCKINNEY
LiquidPower Specialty Products v. Baker Hughes, a GE Company
as 20-2001
Appellant:
LIQUIDPOWER SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC., fka Lubrizol Specialty Products, Inc.
Appellee:
BAKER HUGHES, A GE COMPANY, LLC, fka Baker Hughes Incorporated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
