Cases 11 - 19 of 19
MCBRIDE COTTON V AGRICULTURE
as 05-1051
Plaintiff-Appellant:
BRANDSTATT FAMILY TRUST, C.J. LAND & CATTLE, L.P., GRH LAND & CATTLE CO. and others
Defendant-Appellee:
MIKE JOHANNS, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE
COPELAND V AGRICULTURE
as 03-1326
Appellee:
Ann M. Veneman, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE
Appellant:
BILL J. COPELAND
RAIN AND HAIL INSUR V AGRICULTURE
as 02-1062
Appellee:
ANN M. VENEMAN, Secretary of Agriculture, PHYLLIS W. HONOR, ACTING MANAGER, FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE COR, ANN M. VENEMAN, Secretary of Agriculture and others
Appellant:
RAIN AND HAIL INSURANCE SERVICE, INC., RAIN AND HAIL L.L.C., RAIN AND HAIL INSURANCE SERVICE, INC. and others
BUTLER FORD INC V AGRICULTURE
as 02-1012
Appellee:
ANN M. VENEMAN, Secretary of Agriculture, ANN M. VENEMAN, Secretary of Agriculture, ANN M. VENEMAN, Secretary of Agriculture and others
Appellant:
BUTLER FORD, INC., BUTLER FORD, INC., BUTLER FORD, INC. and others
REIDHEAD BROTHERS V AGRICULTURE
as 01-1441
Appellee:
ANN M. VENEMAN, Secretary of Agriculture
Appellant:
REIDHEAD BROTHERS LUMBER MILL
LANCE LOGGING V AGRICULTURE
as 01-1265
Appellee:
ANN M. VENEMAN, Secretary of Agriculture, ANN M. VENEMAN, Secretary of Agriculture and ANN M. VENEMAN, Secretary of Agriculture
Appellant:
LANCE LOGGING CO., INC. (dba Wolf Creek Industries), WOLF CREEK INDUSTRIES, INC., LANCE LOGGING CO., INC. (dba Wolf Creek Industries) and others
RIDGE RUNNER FORESTRY V AGRICULTURE
as 01-1233
Appellee:
ANN M. VENEMAN, Secretary of Agriculture, ANN M. VENEMAN, Secretary of Agriculture and ANN M. VENEMAN, Secretary of Agriculture
Appellant:
RIDGE RUNNER FORESTRY, RIDGE RUNNER FORESTRY and RIDGE RUNNER FORESTRY
HART V AGRICULTURE
as 00-3407
Petitioner:
CHERYL A. HART
Respondent:
DAN R. GLICKMAN, Secretary of Agriculture
POSTON LOGGING V AGRICULTURE
as 00-1455
Appellee:
DAN R. GLICKMAN, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE
Appellant:
POSTON LOGGING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
