Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 26 of 26
APOTEX V HHS
as 02-1295
Plaintiff-Appellant: APOTEX, INC.
Defendant-Appellee: LESTER M. CRAWFORD, Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food & Drug Ad, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TOMMY G. THOMPSON, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
KALODNER V ENERGY
as 02-1148
Defendant-Appellee: ERIC J. FYGI, Acting General Counsel, GEORGE B. BREZNAY, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals, SPENCER ABRAHAM, Secretary of Energy and others
Plaintiff-Appellant: PHILIP P. KALODNER, PHILIP P. KALODNER, PHILIP P. KALODNER and others
PICCONE V MOATZ
as 01-1331
Defendant-Appellee: ALBIN DROST, Deputy Solicitor, PTO, BRUCE A. LEHMAN, Asst Secretary and Commissioner, PTO, CAMERON K. WEIFFENBACH, Former Dir, Ofc of Enrollment and DiSCIP, PTO and others
Plaintiff-Appellant: LOUIS A. PICCONE, LOUIS A. PICCONE and LOUIS A. PICCONE
WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS V FDA
as 01-1285
Defendant-Appellee: BERNARD A. SCHWETZ, D.V.M., PH.D., Acting Principal Deputy COMM, FDA, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, BERNARD A. SCHWETZ, D.V.M., PH.D., Acting Principal Deputy COMM, FDA and others
Plaintiff-Appellant: DANBURY PHARMACAL, INC., WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., DANBURY PHARMACAL, INC. and others
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS V HHS
as 01-1257
Defendant-Appellee: BERNARD A. SCHWETZ, D.V.M., PH.D., Acting Principal Deputy C, TOMMY G. THOMPSON, Secretary of Health & Human Services, U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION and others
Defendant-Appellant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Amicus Curiae: GRAY PANTHERS PROJECT FUND, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION, GRAY PANTHERS PROJECT FUND and others
Plaintiff-Appellee: MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
WHITE V CLINTON
as 00-1576
Defendant-Appellee: MARGARET LIVINGSTON, Deputy Clerk, USCA, Atlanta GA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?