Cases 31 - 40 of 46
FRANKLIN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK V US
as 04-5137
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
A. EUGENE JOLLEY, BEN B. JARNAGIN, CHARLES G. ROBINETTE and others
Amicus Curiae:
Sterling Savings Bank
Defendant-Appellant:
UNITED STATES
PALM BEACH ISLES ASSOC V US
as 04-5047
Plaintiff-Appellant:
ESTATE OF JOSEPH SLIFKA, MARJORIE MARGOLIS, Individual, MARTIN SLIFKA, Individually and others
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
FRANKLIN SAVINGS CORP V US
as 03-5121
Plaintiff-Appellant:
FRANKLIN SAVINGS ASSOCIATION and FRANKLIN SAVINGS CORPORATION
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
CAIN V US
as 03-5020
Plaintiff-Appellant:
DAVID CAIN, FRANKLIN R. HARRISON, JIM KOCHEVAR and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION:
FRANKLIN R. HARRISON:
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
OWENS V DVA
as 02-7234
Respondent-Appellee:
ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
FRANKLIN D. OWENS
FRANKLIN V USPS
as 02-3120
Petitioner:
GILLIAN L. FRANKLIN, GILLIAN L. FRANKLIN, GILLIAN L. FRANKLIN and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
FRANKLIN V US
as 01-1340
Plaintiff-Appellant:
ARTHUR L. FRANKLIN (d/b/a Health Technologies Network), ARTHUR L. FRANKLIN (d/b/a Health Technologies Network) and ARTHUR L. FRANKLIN (d/b/a Health Technologies Network)
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES
FRANKLIN PAVKOV CONSTR V AIR FORCE
as 01-1010
Appellant:
FRANKLIN PAVKOV CONSTRUCTION CO., FRANKLIN PAVKOV CONSTRUCTION CO. and FRANKLIN PAVKOV CONSTRUCTION CO.
Appellee:
JAMES G. ROCHE, Secretary of the Air Force, JAMES G. ROCHE, Secretary of the Air Force and JAMES G. ROCHE, Secretary of the Air Force
JAMES G. ROCHE, Secretary Of The Air Force:
, and
ANDERSON V US
as 00-5107
Plaintiff-Appellant:
GLENN FRANKLIN ANDERSON
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
