Cases 51 - 60 of 167
ASSISTED HOUSING SERVICES CORP. et al v. USA
as 1:2012cv00862
Plaintiff:
ASSISTED HOUSING SERVICES CORP. , NORTH TAMPA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. and CALIFORNIA AFFORDABLE HOUSING INITIATIVES, INC.
Defendant:
USA
CMS CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SERVICES et al v. USA
as 1:2012cv00852
Plaintiff:
CMS CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SERVICES and THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON
Defendant:
USA
Consolidated_plaintiff:
NATIONAL HOUSING COMPLIANCE , ASSISTED HOUSING SERVICES CORP. , NORTH TAMPA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY
NATIONAL HOUSING COMPLIANCE v. USA
as 1:2012cv00853
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL HOUSING COMPLIANCE
Defendant:
USA
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA et al v. USA
as 1:2012cv00209
Plaintiff:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA and HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
BLACKFEET HOUSING v. USA
as 1:2012cv00004
WEST JEFFERSON HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. USA
as 1:2011cv00846
Plaintiff:
WEST JEFFERSON HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
BURKE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. USA
as 1:2011cv00816
Plaintiff:
BURKE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
CONWAY HOUSING ASSOCIATES I v. USA
as 1:2011cv00820
Plaintiff:
CONWAY HOUSING ASSOCIATES I
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
FOUNTAIN INN HOUSING ASSOCIATES v. USA
as 1:2011cv00825
Plaintiff:
FOUNTAIN INN HOUSING ASSOCIATES
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
RUTHERFORD COLLEGE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. USA
as 1:2011cv00837
Plaintiff:
RUTHERFORD COLLEGE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
