Cases 51 - 60 of 92
THOMAS-BEY v. USA
as 1:2017cv01127
Plaintiff:
KELLY SCOTT THOMAS-BEY
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
LOVERIDGE et al v. USA
as 1:2016cv00912
Plaintiff:
PERRY LOVERIDGE , NEAL ABRAHAMSON , RANDY ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2014cv00101
Plaintiff:
GENE KELLY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
VANYO et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2013vv00422
Petitioner:
SEAN VANYO , KELLY VANYO and CARSON VANYO
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
ENGEN et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2013vv00018
Petitioner:
STEVEN ENGEN , KELLIE ENGEN and KELLEN ENGEN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
COPAR PUMICE COMPANY, INC et al v. USA
as 1:2012cv00894
Plaintiff:
COPAR PUMICE COMPANY, INC and KELLY ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
SCHULTZ et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00590
Petitioner:
KELLY SCHULTZ , PETER SCHULTZ and L. S.
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
COMEAUX et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00348
Petitioner:
BRYAN COMEAUX , KELLY COMEAUX and CAROLINE COMEAUX
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
HOWARD et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00324
Petitioner:
KELLY HOWARD and NATALIE HOWARD
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
SCHULTZ v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00234
Petitioner:
KELLY SCHULTZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
