Cases 61 - 70 of 559
Tubular Rollers, LLC v. Maximus Oilfield Products, LLC
as 21-2319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TUBULAR ROLLERS, LLC, ROLLING TOOL, INC. and H. LESTER WALD
Defendant / Appellee:
MAXIMUS OILFIELD PRODUCTS, LLC, NABORS INDUSTRIES, LTD. and NABORS DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
Atkins v. Stivers
as 21-2271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIEF JUDGE GREG N. STIVERS, JUDGE DAVID J. HALE, JUDGE REBECCA GRADY JENNINGS and others
G&H Diversified Manufacturing, LPIn re: G&H Diversified Manufacturing, LP
as 21-176
Petitioner:
In re: G&H DIVERSIFIED MANUFACTURING, LP
Respondent:
DYNAENERGETICS EUROPE GMBH and DYNAENERGETICS US, INC.
RiggsIn re: Riggs
as 21-2108
Appellant:
RALPH K. BRECHTER, LOUIS F. INDELICATO, JON L. CLOW and others
Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Kriner v. McDonough
as 21-2076
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant:
HARRIET H. KRINER
Baker v. Raimondo
as 21-1961
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD H. BAKER and DONALD L. BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary of Commerce
Sharrock v. US
as 21-1889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHIL S. KO, XUECHEN ZHANG, HYUNIL JO LEE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Baker v. McDonough
as 21-1863
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant:
RICHARD H. BAKER
Bonner v. McDonough
as 21-1817
Claimant:
MARK H. BONNER
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Koopmann v. US
as 21-1746
Plaintiff:
EUGENE R. BISCAILUZ, JAMES H. BIESTEK, ROBERT L. BEAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM ROYALL, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
