Cases 61 - 70 of 402
MAHER V DVA
as 11-7037
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
Joseph T. Maher, Jr.
HAMER V DVA
as 11-7033
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
Steven W. Hamer
BARELA V DVA
as 11-7022
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
Silverio Barela
HUGHS V DVA
as 11-7021
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
Joe D. Hughs
AKERS V DVA
as 11-7018
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
Vickie H. Akers
YOUNG V DVA
as 11-7019
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
Russell J. Young
BOUSQUET V DVA
as 11-7017
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
Ronald F. Bousquet, Ronald F. Bousquet and Ronald F. Bousquet
PATRICK V DVA
as 11-7012
Claimant-Appellant:
Carolyn J. Patrick, Carolyn J. Patrick, Carolyn J. Patrick and others
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
CULLEN V DVA
as 11-7005
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Claimant-Appellant:
Gerard Cullen, Gerard Cullen, Gerard Cullen and others
HILL V DVA
as 11-7016
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Claimant-Appellant:
Samuel E. Hill, III, Samuel E. Hill, III, Samuel E. Hill, III and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.