Cases 81 - 90 of 115
NEWHOUSE V DVA
as 06-7302
Respondent-Appellee:
R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
Roger H. Newhouse
MOORE V DVA
as 06-7260
Respondent-Appellant:
R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellee:
Roger A. Moore
HENRY-GRIFFITTS V ACUSHNET COMPANY
as 06-1278
Defendant:
Acushnet Company (d/b/a Titleist Golf), Acushnet Company (d/b/a Titleist Golf) and Acushnet Company (d/b/a Titleist Golf)
Defendant-Appellee:
Roger Cleveland Golf Company, Inc., Taylor Made Golf Company, Roger Cleveland Golf Company, Inc. and others
FREEDOM WIRELESS V BOSTON COMM
as 06-1020
Defendant-Appellant:
AT&T WIRELESS PCS, BOSTON COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC., CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC, COXCOM, INC. and others
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
FREEDOM WIRELESS, INC., FREEDOM WIRELESS, INC. and FREEDOM WIRELESS, INC.
FREEDOM WIRELESS, INC:
, , and others
Movant-Appellant:
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., NEXTEL OPERATIONS, INC. (now known as Sprint Nextel Corporation), NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and others
Defendant-Appellee:
ROGERS WIRELESS, INC. (a/k/a Rogers AT&T Wireless), ROGERS WIRELESS, INC. (a/k/a Rogers AT&T Wireless) and ROGERS WIRELESS, INC. (a/k/a Rogers AT&T Wireless)
NORMAN V US
as 05-5039
Plaintiff-Appellant:
DON ROGER NORMAN, ROGER WILLIAM NORMAN and SOUTH MEADOWS PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
INNOMED TECH V WORLDWIDE MEDICAL
as 05-1035
Movant-Appellant:
MEDICAL INDUSTRIES AMERICA, INC.
Defendant-Appellee:
S. ROGER STRICKLAND, JR., SUNBURST CONSULTING, L.L.C. and WORLDWIDE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
PLUMLEY V MOCKETT
as 05-1028
Defendant-Appellant:
DOUGLAS ALFRED JAMES MOCKETT
Plaintiff-Appellee:
ROGER PLUMLEY
KEENER V DVA
as 04-7051
Respondent-Appellant:
ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellee:
ROGER E. KEENER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
