Cases 1 - 10 of 12
IN RE RODGERS
as 10-1384
Appellee:
David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and others
Appellant:
Paul L. Liebenberg, Ronald J. Reynolds, Steven J. Rusconi and others
GAINES V DVA
as 08-7094
Respondent-Appellee:
James B. Peake, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
Thurman Gaines, Jr.
THURMAN V DVA
as 07-7142
Appellee:
Gordon H. Mansfield, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
L.J. Thurman
THURMAN V DVA
as 02-7083
Respondent-Appellee:
ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Claimant-Appellant:
ULYSSES THURMAN, ULYSSES THURMAN, ULYSSES THURMAN and others
GSA V HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION
as 01-1353
Appellee:
HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO., HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO. and HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO.
Appellant:
Thurman J. Davis, Sr., Acting Administrator, General Services Administr, Thurman J. Davis, Sr., Acting Administrator, General Services Administr and Thurman J. Davis, Sr., Acting Administrator, General Services Administr
SCHICKLER V GSA
as 01-1170
Appellee:
Thurman J. Davis, Sr., Acting Administrator, General Services Administr, Thurman J. Davis, Sr., Acting Administrator, General Services Administr and Thurman J. Davis, Sr., Acting Administrator, General Services Administr
Appellant:
VINCENT SCHICKLER, VINCENT SCHICKLER and VINCENT SCHICKLER
PROGRAM AND CONSTRUCTION V GSA
as 00-1386
Appellant:
PROGRAM AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Appellee:
Thurman J. Davis, Sr., Acting ADMINISTRATOR GENERAL SERVICES
PROGRAM AND CONSTRUCTION V GSA
as 00-1312
Appellant:
PROGRAM AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Appellee:
Thurman J. Davis, Sr., Acting ADMINISTRATOR GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
