Cases 1 - 10 of 12
WALSH CONSTRUCTION V ARMY
as 03-1212
Appellee:
THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
Appellant:
WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF ILLINOIS
JARRETT V ARMY
as 03-1242
Plaintiff-Appellant:
CLARENCE E. JARRETT
Defendant-Appellee:
THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
CHAS G WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION V ARMY
as 02-1462
Appellant:
CHARLES G. WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Appellee:
THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
ROY CASE CONSTRUCTION V ARMY
as 02-1316
Appellant:
ROY CASE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Appellee:
THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
GRID CONSTRUCTION V ARMY
as 02-1044
Appellant:
GRID CONSTRUCTION, INC., GRID CONSTRUCTION, INC., GRID CONSTRUCTION, INC. and others
Appellee:
THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY and others
ERWIN PFISTER V ARMY
as 01-1638
Appellant:
ERWIN PFISTER GENERAL-BAUUNTERNEHMUNG
Appellee:
THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
ARMY V EDSALL CONSTRUCTION
as 01-1628
Appellee:
EDSALL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Appellant:
THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
DOUBLE B ENTERPRISES V US
as 01-1593
Appellant:
DOUBLE B ENTERPRISES, INC.
Appellee:
THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
RAYTHEON COMPANY V ARMY
as 01-1350
Appellant:
RAYTHEON COMPANY (doing business as Raytheon Systems Company, RAYTHEON COMPANY (doing business as Raytheon Systems Company and RAYTHEON COMPANY (doing business as Raytheon Systems Company
Appellee:
THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY and THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
ARMY V DELTA CONSTRUCTION
as 01-1253
Appellee:
DELTA CONSTRUCTION INTERNATIONAL, INC., DELTA CONSTRUCTION INTERNATIONAL, INC. and DELTA CONSTRUCTION INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Appellant:
THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY and THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
