Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Bonn-Wittingham v. Project OHR, Inc.
as 18-1781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Judy Bonn-Wittingham, Melva Jones, Germita Fremont and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Project OHR, Inc., Office for Homecare Refferal, Metropolitan Council on Jewish Poverty and D' Vorah Kohn
Sanchez v. IND Glatt, Inc.
as 17-3467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bernardo Sanchez and Edgar Delgado, Individually and on behalf of other persons similarly situated who are employed by IND Glatt, Inc., and I & D Glatt 2, Inc., doing business I&D Glatt or any other entities affiliated with or controlled by IND Glatt, Inc. and David Yizhaky
Defendant - Appellee:
IND Glatt, Inc., I&D Glatt 2, Inc., doing business as I&D Glatt or any other entities affiliated with or controlled by IND, Glatt, Inc., I&D Glatt 2, Inc. and David Yizhaky and David Yizhaky
Sawabini v. O'Connor Hospital
as 17-3389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lutfallah T. Sawabini
Defendant - Appellee:
Edward McGrath, Harold Southworth, Chief Security Agent, Mary McCarthy, Registered Nurse and others
Defendant:
O'Connor Hospital, New York State Division of Human Rights, Victor DeAmelia and others
Ekryss v. Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc.
as 16-3408
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bryan Bland, Tarah L. Clemens, Toni Lacada Newborn and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Kevin Cottingim, Dean Riesen, Raymond A. Blanchette, III and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Kevin Toole and Brooke Allison Stevens
Defendant:
Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc.
Wang v. The Hearst Corporation
as 16-3302
Plaintiff:
Jessica Ann Best, Paul Vance, Courtney Holt and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xuedan Wang, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Matthew Jordan Wagster, Erin E. Spencer, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
The Hearst Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Economic Policy Institute and others
Stevens v. HMSHost Corporation
as 14-3652
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jimmy Michael Tuttle, Luis D. Colondres Valentin, Yahya Karimi and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Host Services of New York, Inc., HMSHost Corporation and Host International, Inc.
Paguay v. Barbasso, Inc.
as 14-3204
Plaintiff - Appellee:
David Paguay, individually & on behalf of all other persons similarly who were employed by Buona Fortuna, Inc. dba Basso 56 and/or Paolo Cantini and/or Aleksander Kola; & any other entities affiliated with or controlled by Buona Fortuna, Inc. dba Basso 56, Aquilino Molina and Daniel Mackenzie
Defendant:
Barbasso, Inc., DBA Basso 56
Defendant - Appellant:
Paolo Cantini, and any other entities affiliated with or controlled by Barbasso, Inc d/b/a Basso 56 and/or Paolo Cantini and/or Aleksander Kola, Aleksander Kola, and any other entities affiliated with or controlled by Barbasso, Inc d/b/a Basso 56 and/or Paolo Cantini and/or Aleksander Kola and Buona Fortuna, Inc., DBA Basso 56
Tracy v. NVR, Inc.
as 14-609
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gorczyca, Lisa Rybarczyk, Robert Marcello and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Peter Gavin, K. Maura Mueller and Patrick Tracy, on behalf of himself and all other employees similarly situated
Petitioner:
William Mix and James Hutt, IV
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Christine Giambrone
Defendant - Appellee:
NVR, Inc.
Wang v. The Hearst Corporation
as 13-4480
Plaintiff:
Jessica Ann Best, Paul Vance, Courtney Holt and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xuedan Wang, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Elizabeth Mancini, Matthew Jordan Wagster and others
Defendant - Appellee:
The Hearst Corporation
Jacob v. Duane Reade, Inc.
as 13-3873
Plaintiff:
Ousmane Diop, Forbes M. Lewis, Sanjeev Farid and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Mani Jacob, Individually and on behalf of all others similary situated and Lesleena Mars, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Defendant - Appellant:
Duane Reade Holdings, Inc. and Duane Reade, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
