Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Ocampo v. Building Service 32B-J Pension
as 14-877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Francy Ocampo
Defendant - Appellee:
Building Service 32B-J Pension Fund, and the Board of Trustees for the Building Service 32BJ Pension Fund and Board of Trustees for the Building Service 32BJ Pension Fund
Diamond v. Local 807 LaborManagement Pens
as 14-676
Petitioner - Appellant:
Lance S. Diamond
Respondent - Appellee:
Local 807 LaborManagement Pension Fund, John Sullivan, Anthony Storz and others
Marmol v. Division 1181 A.T.U.- New York
as 14-495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jose Marmol
Defendant - Appellee:
Division 1181 A.T.U.- New York Employees Pension Fund and Plan
Bricklayers and Allied Craftwo v. Moulton Masonry & Construction
as 14-295
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local 2, Albany, New York Pension Fund, by its Administrator, Stephen J. O'Sick, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local 2, Albany, New York Health Benefit Fund, by its Administrator, Stephen J. O'Sick, Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen Local 2 Annuity Fund, by its Administrator, Stephen J. O'Sick and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Moulton Masonry & Construction, LLC and Duane E. Moulton, individually and as an Officer of Moulton Masonry &Construction, LLC
Trustees of the New York City v. Integrated Structures Corp.
as 13-4621
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining Educational and Industry Fund, Charity Fund, New York City and Vicinity Carpenters Labor-Management Cooperation Fund and District Council for New York City and Vicinity, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Integrated Structures Corp.
Marmol v. Division 1181 A.T.U. New York
as 13-4493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jose Marmol
Defendant - Appellee:
Division 1181 A.T.U. New York Employees Pension Fund and Plan
666 Drug, Inc. v. The Trustee of 1199 SEIU Healt
as 13-3280
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
666 Drug, Inc., FKA Melrose Pharmacy, a New York Corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
The Trustee of 1199 SEIU Health Care Employess Pension Fund
In Re: Bank of New York Mellon
as 13-3064
Plaintiff:
State of Oregon By and Through the Oregon State Treasurer on Behalf of the Common School Fund and, Together with the Oregon Public Employee Retirement Board, on Behalf of the Oregon Public Employee Re, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Isabel F. Sansano, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marilyn Clark, Derivatively on behalf of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and Iron Workets Mid-South Pension Fund, Derivatively on behalf of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
Gerald L. Hassell, Arthur Certosimo, James P. Palermo and others
International Brotherhood of E v. M. Gleason &Sons of Binghamton
as 13-1908
Plaintiff - Appellee:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 325 Pension Fund, by James F. Collins and Kimberly A. Bautista, as Trustees, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 325 Joint Trust Fund, by James F. Collins and Kimberly A. Bautista, as Trustees, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 325 Annuity Fund, by James F. Collins and Kimberly A. Bautista, as Trustees and others
Defendant - Appellant:
M. Gleason &Sons of Binghamton, NY, Inc. and Robert M. Gleason, Jr., Individually and as an Officer of M. Gleason &Sons of Binghamton, NY, Inc.
Delollis v. Friedberg, Smith & Co PC
as 13-1628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Delollis, in his capacity as Trustee, Tom Holsman, in his capacity as Trustee, Empire State Carpenters Welfare Fund and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Friedberg, Smith & Co PC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
