Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Singh v. Deloitte LLP
as 23-1108
Plaintiff / Appellant: Rupinder Singh, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jeffrey S. Popkin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Joni Walker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Deloitte LLP, The Board of Directors of Deloitte LLP, The Retirement Plan Committee of Deloitte LLP and others
Pessin v. JPMorgan Chase U.S. Benefits Executive
as 23-25
Plaintiff / Appellant: Joseph Pessin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: JPMorgan Chase U.S. Benefits Executive, as Plan Administrator of the JPMorgan Chase Retirement Plan, Board of Directors of JPMorgan Chase Bank and J.P. Morgan Chase & Company and JPMorgan Chase Retirement Plan
Lloyd v. Argent Trust Company
as 22-3116
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jamaal Lloyd, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the W BBQ Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Anastasia Jenkins
Defendant / Appellant: Argent Trust Company, Herbert Wetanson, Gregor Wetanson and others
Radcliffe v. Aetna, Inc.
as 22-2757
Plaintiff / Appellant: Raymond Radcliffe, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Carol Flaim, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee: Aetna, Inc., CVS Health Corporation, Aetna Benefits Finance Committee and others
Defendant: Frank M. Clark, Betty Z. Cohen, Jeffrey Garten and others
Grosso v. AT&T Pension Benefit Plan
as 22-1701
Plaintiff / Appellant: Vincent C. Grosso, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated and Patricia M. Wing, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee: AT&T Pension Benefit Plan and AT&T Services, Inc., as Plan Administrator
Plutzer v. Bankers Trust Company of South
as 22-561
Plaintiff / Appellant: Edward Plutzer, on behalf of the Tharanco Group, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: Bankers Trust Company of South Dakota, a South Dakota Limited Liability Corporation, Haresh T. Tharani, Michael J. Setola and others
McCutcheon v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-3225
Defendant / Appellant: Daniel Marsili, Colgate-Palmolive Co., Employee Relations Committee of Colgate-Palmolive Co. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Rebecca McCutcheon, On behalf of themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Paul Caufield, On behalf of themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Patrico v. Voya Financial, Inc.
as 18-1057
Plaintiff - Appellant: Lisa Patrico, on behalf of The Nestle 401(K) Savings Plan and all other similarly situated Individual Account Plans
Defendant - Appellee: Voya Financial, Inc., Voya Institutional Plan Services, LLC, Voya Investments Management, LLC and others
Jander v. International Business Machine We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-3518
Plaintiff - Appellant: Larry W. Jander, and all other individuals similarly situated and Richard J. Waksman
Defendant - Appellee: International Business Machines Corporation, Retirement Plans Committee of IBM, Richard Carroll and others
The National Retirement Fund v. Caesars Entertainment
as 17-249
Plaintiff - Appellee: The National Retirement Fund, each on behalf of the Legacy Plan of the National Retirement Fund and Richard N. Rust, in his capacity as Fund Manager, each on behalf of the Legacy Plan of the National Retirement Fund
Defendant: John Does, 1-10 all other trades or businesses under common control with Caesars Entertainment Corporation and Caesars Entertainment Resort Properties, LLC that have not filed for bankruptcy
Defendant - Appellant: Caesars Entertainment Corporation and Caesars Entertainment Resort Properties, LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?