Cases 61 - 70 of 107
Roth v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 12-2509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andrew E. Roth, derivately on behalf of Leap Wireless International, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Leap Wireless International, Inc.
IN RE: AMARANTH NATURAL GAS CO
as 12-2075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Roberto E. Calle Gracey, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, John F. Special, Gregory H. Smith, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Amaranth Advisors, LLC, Amaranth Advisors Calgary ULC, Amaranth Capital Partners LLC and others
IN RE American International G
as 12-890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alan Rothstein, Objector and Mollye Rothstein, Objector
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, Ohio Police And Fire Pension Fund, Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico and others
Defendant:
Maurice Greenberg, Howard Smith, Thomas Tizzio and others
Defendant - Appellee:
American International Group, Inc.
Interested-Third-Party:
Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System
Objector:
Margaret B. Amidei, Karen J. Michaels, Lee Janovits and others
Objector - Appellant:
Rinis Travel Service Inc.
In Re: Direxion Shares ETF Tru
as 12-725
Plaintiff:
Evan Stoopler, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Thomas C. Longman, Michael Salach, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Appellant:
Barton Boothe
Defendant - Appellee:
Direxion Shares ETF Trust, Daniel O'Neill, Daniel J. Byrne and others
IN RE American International G
as 12-692
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, Ohio Police And Fire Pension Fund, Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico and others
Defendant:
Maurice Greenberg, Howard Smith, Thomas Tizzio and others
Defendant - Appellee:
American International Group, Inc.
Interested-Third-Party:
Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System
Objector:
Margaret B. Amidei, Karen J. Michaels, Lee Janovits and others
Objector - Appellant:
Steve A. Miller, P.C. Profit Sharing Plan, Trustee
Cleantech Innovations, Inc. v. Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC
as 12-524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cleantech Innovations, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC, Merit E. Janow, Stephen D. Barrett and others
In Re Herald, Primeo and Thema
as 12-184
Plaintiff:
Repex Ventures S.A, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and Schmuel Cabilly
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shmuel Cabilly, Korea Exchange Bank, Dana Trezziova and others
Defendant:
Bernard L. Madoff, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, Bank Medici S.A. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sonja Kohn, Primeo Select Fund, Primeo Executive Fund and others
In Re Herald, Primeo and Thema
as 12-184
Defendant / Appellee:
Alberto LaRocca, Pioneer Alternative Investment Management Limited, Herald (LUX) and others
Defendant:
William A. Jones, Richard Goddard, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Schmuel Cabilly, Neville Seymour Davis, Dana Trezziova and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shmuel Cabilly and Korea Exchange Bank
In Re Herald, Primeo and Thema
as 12-156
Plaintiff:
Repex Ventures S.A, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Shmuel Cabilly, Schmuel Cabilly and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dana Trezziova
Defendant:
Bernard L. Madoff, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, Bank Medici S.A. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sonja Kohn, Primeo Select Fund, Primeo Executive Fund and others
In Re: Herald, Primeo and Them
as 12-156
Defendant / Appellee:
Alberto LaRocca, Pioneer Alternative Investment Management Limited, Herald USA Fund and others
Defendant:
William A. Jones, Richard Goddard, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Schmuel Cabilly and Repex Ventures S.A, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Neville Seymour Davis, Shmuel Cabilly, Korea Exchange Bank and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
