Cases 1 - 10 of 18
L &M Bus Corp. v. Board of Education of the City
as 18-1913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
L &M Bus Corp., B & F Skilled Inc., Happy Child Transportations LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, DBA New York City Department of Education
Laricchiuta v. Nassau County Interim Finance
as 18-1634
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jerry Laricchiuta, as Local President of CSEA Nassau County Local 830, Danny Donohue, as President of the Civil Service Employees Association, Inc. Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO and Civil Service Employees Association, Local 1000 AFSCME, AFL-CIO
Defendant - Appellee:
Nassau County Interim Finance Authority, Ronald A. Stack, as Chairman and Director of the Nassau County Interim Finance Authority, Robert A. Wild and others
Commissioner of Social Service v. Clarke
as 18-1579
Petitioner - Appellee:
Commissioner of Social Services, Petitioner/Assignee on behalf of Tammy Boertlein, Assignor
Respondent - Appellant:
Roger W. Clarke, Jr.
Suffolk County Department of S v. Clarke
as 18-83
Petitioner - Appellee:
Suffolk County Department of Social Services, O/B/O Tammy Boertlein
Respondent - Appellant:
Roger W. Clarke, Jr.
Friends of the East Hampton Ai v. Town of East Hampton
as 15-2334
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Friends of the East Hampton Airport, Inc, Analar Corporation, Associated Aircraft Group, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Air Pegasus Corp.
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Town of East Hampton
Amicus Curiae:
General Aviation Manufacturers Association, Inc.
Mental Hygiene Legal Services v. Cuomo
as 14-1421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mental Hygiene Legal Services
Defendant:
Atoosa P. Mamdani, Shawn Short, David Paterson and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Andrew Cuomo, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Eric T. Schneiderman, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, Ann Marie Sullivan, in her official capacity as Acting Commissioner of the New York State of Mental Health and others
Concerned Home Care Providers, v. Cuomo
as 13-3790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Concerned Home Care Providers, Inc., American Chore Services, Inc., DBA City Choice Home Care Services, Community Home Care Referral Service, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Andrew M. Cuomo, in his capacity as the Governor of the State of New York and Nirav R. Shah, M.D., M.P.H., in his capacity as the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health
Community Health Care Associat v. New York State Department of H
as 13-3454
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Community Health Care Association of New York, Anthony L. Jordan Health Center, Community Health Center of Buffalo, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Health, State of New York and Does, 1-20
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Richard F. Daines, Medical Doctor, in his official capacity as Commissioner and Nirav R. Shah, Medical Doctor, in his official capacity as Commissioner
Community Health Care Associat v. New York State Department of H
as 13-3332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Community Health Care Association of New York, Anthony L. Jordan Health Center, Brooklyn Plaza Medical Center, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Health, Richard F. Daines, Medical Doctor, in his official capacity as Commissioner, Nirav R. Shah, Medical Doctor, in his official capacity as Commissioner and others
Community Health Care Associat v. New York State Department of
as 13-991
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Community Health Care Association of New York, Anthony L. Jordan Health Center, Bedford Stuyvesant Family Health Center, Inc. and others
Defendant:
State of New York, New York State Department of Health and Does 1-20
Defendant - Appellant:
M.D. Richard F. Daines, in his official capacity as Commissioner and M.D. Nirav R. Shah, in his official capacity as Commissioner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
