Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Cortes v. Twenty-First Century Fox Ameri
as 18-414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Francisco Cortes
Defendant - Appellee:
21st Century Fox America, Inc. and Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Johnson v. Nextel Communications Incorpor
as 17-3505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael S. Johnson, individually and on behalf of the class, Patricia Long Correa, individually and on behalf of the class, Donna Dymkowski, individually and on behalf of the class and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Nextel Communications Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation
Defendant:
Leeds, Morelli & Brown PC, Lenard Leeds, Steven A. Morelli and others
Markel Insurance Company v. Ebner Camps, Inc
as 17-2802
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Markel Insurance Company
Defendant:
John Doe
Defendant - Appellant:
Ebner Camps, Inc
Andrews v. Sony/ATV Music Publishing, LLC
as 17-872
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrews, AKA Sisqo, James Green, AKA Woody and Larry Anthony, Jr., AKA Jazz
Movant - Appellant:
Art of War Music Publishing, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Sony/ATV Music Publishing, LLC, as successor to EMI Music Pub., EMI April Music, Inc. and EMI Blackwood Music Inc.
Defendant:
27 Red Music, Estate of Rhondo Robinson, John Doe and others
Andrews v. Sony/ATV Music Publishing, LLC
as 17-866
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark Andrews, AKA Sisqo, James Green, AKA Woody and Larry Anthony, Jr., AKA Jazz
Movant - Appellant:
Art of War Music Publishing, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Sony/ATV Music Publishing, LLC, as successor to EMI Music Pub., EMI April Music, Inc. and EMI Blackwood Music Inc.
Defendant:
27 Red Music, Estate of Rhondo Robinson, John Doe and others
Estler v. Dunkin' Brands, Inc.
as 16-3762
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas Estler, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Blake Ruehrwein, On behalf of themselves and all others simiarly situated and Steven Park, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Dunkin' Brands, Inc., Dunkin' Donuts Store, #350125, Dunkin' Donuts Store, #350126 and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-500
Weihai Textile Group Import v. Level 8 Apparel, LLC
as 16-3382
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Weihai Textile Group Import & Export Co., Ltd.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Level 8 Apparel, LLC and World Cross Culture, Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
Sam Kim
Defendant:
John Doe 1-10 and XYZ Company, 1-10
United Torah Education v. Solomon Capital LLC
as 14-3454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United Torah Education & Scholarship Fund, Inc., A Florida non for profit corporation
Defendant:
John Does, 1-100, fictitious persons and XYZ Corporations, 1-100, fictitious entities
Defendant - Appellee:
Solomon Capital LLC, New York limited liability company, Solomon Capital 401(k) Trust, A New York qualified retirement trust, Solomon Sharbat, trustee, Solomon Capital Living Trust, A New York qualified retirement trust, Solomon Sharbat, trustee and others
Houston v. Teamsters Local 210, Affiliate
as 14-2899
Plaintiff:
Andonis Garrido, Damingo Munoz, Domingo Yanez and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Douglas Houston
Defendant - Appellee:
Teamsters Local 210, Affiliated Health and Insurance Fund - Vacation Fringe Benefit Fund and John Doe, plan administrator, trustee
Chen v. Ma
as 14-664
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Weiming Chen, Preparatory Committee of Statue of Democracy (Foundation), 1919 Madison Avenue, Apt. 417, New York, NY 10005
Defendant - Appellee:
Ying-jeou Ma, The President of the Republic of China, Taiwan (ROC), 122 Chongqing South Road, Zhongzheng District, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC c/o Taipei Economic &Cultural Office (TECO) 1 East 42nd Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 100176904, Hsi-lung Lee, The Chief of the Bureau of Civil Affairs Government of Kinmen County, 60 Minshend Rd, Jincheng Tsp., Kinmen County 893, Taiwan, the Republic of China c/o Taipei Economic &Cultural Office (TECO) 1 East 42nd Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10, John Does and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
