Intellectual Property Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
United States Polo Association v. PRL USA Holdings, Inc.
as 13-1038
Appellant: United States Polo Association, Inc. and USPA Properties, Inc.
Counter Claimant: L'Oreal USA, Inc. and PRL USA Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant: JRA Trademark Company, Ltd.
United States Polo Association v. PRL USA Holdings, Inc.
as 13-1130
Appellant: United States Polo Association, Inc. and USPA Properties, Inc.
Counter Claimant: L'Oreal USA, Inc. and PRL USA Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff: JRA Trademark Company, Ltd.
MacKay v. Crews
as 14-1566
Plaintiff: Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant: Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee: Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
MacKay v. Crews
as 14-836
Plaintiff: Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant: Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee: Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
MacKay v. Crews
as 13-4140
Plaintiff: Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant: Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee: Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
United States Polo Association v. PRL USA Holdings, Inc.
as 12-1346
Appellant: United States Polo Association, Inc. and USPA Properties, Inc.
Counter Claimant: PRL USA Holdings, Inc.
Appellee: L'Oreal USA, Inc.
United States Polo Association v. PRL USA Holdings, Inc.
as 13-1130
Plaintiff: JRA Trademark Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: United States Polo Association, Inc. and USPA Properties, Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: PRL USA Holdings, Inc. and L'Oreal USA, Inc.
United States Polo Association v. PRL USA Holdings, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1038
Plaintiff - Appellant: JRA Trademark Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: United States Polo Association, Inc. and USPA Properties, Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: PRL USA Holdings, Inc. and L'Oreal USA, Inc.
MacKay v. Crew
as 12-5039
Plaintiff: Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant: Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee: Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
United States Polo Association v. PRL USA Holdings, Inc.
as 12-1346
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: United States Polo Association, Inc. and USPA Properties, Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: PRL USA Holdings, Inc.
Appellee: L'Oreal USA, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?